http://cloudless.net/clouded/archives/2004/10/08/a-procedural-problem/ Sunny Says... Fri, 18 May 2012 00:47:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1 http://cloudless.net/clouded/archives/2004/10/08/a-procedural-problem/#comment-22 Poey Fri, 08 Oct 2004 06:27:15 +0000 http://cloudless.net/clouded/archives/2004/10/08/a-procedural-problem/#comment-22 就算不取approval, 程序上係咪都真係要「單」聲? 就算不取approval, 程序上係咪都真係要「單」聲?

]]> http://cloudless.net/clouded/archives/2004/10/08/a-procedural-problem/#comment-23 Cloudless Fri, 08 Oct 2004 07:11:12 +0000 http://cloudless.net/clouded/archives/2004/10/08/a-procedural-problem/#comment-23 Of course it is nice to inform Beijing, but it is not a required part of the procedure. Of course it is nice to inform Beijing, but it is not a required part of the procedure.

]]> http://cloudless.net/clouded/archives/2004/10/08/a-procedural-problem/#comment-24 momo Sun, 10 Oct 2004 15:32:08 +0000 http://cloudless.net/clouded/archives/2004/10/08/a-procedural-problem/#comment-24 唉~阿華哥都係有名無實... 唉~阿華哥都係有名無實…

]]> http://cloudless.net/clouded/archives/2004/10/08/a-procedural-problem/#comment-25 Forever0512 Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:04:55 +0000 http://cloudless.net/clouded/archives/2004/10/08/a-procedural-problem/#comment-25 Perhaps it's just out of respect to inform Beijing. Perhaps it’s just out of respect to inform Beijing.

]]> http://cloudless.net/clouded/archives/2004/10/08/a-procedural-problem/#comment-28 Poey Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:08:24 +0000 http://cloudless.net/clouded/archives/2004/10/08/a-procedural-problem/#comment-28 或者港獨之後「同北京單聲」就唔係必要程序... 或者港獨之後「同北京單聲」就唔係必要程序…

]]>